The Truth About the Harry Quebert Affair is a writer’s book. By that I don’t mean to imply that it’s a book that will be loved and revered by writers (though it may by those who wish to make a living out of writing) but that it’s a book full of writers. Its central character and narrator (Marcus Goldman) is a writer; his mentor, the titular Harry Quebert, is a writer also. Both have had the misfortune to have written one very successful book. In Harry’s case his magnum opus, The Origin of Evil, was published a number of years ago; Goldman’s success is more recent: a best-selling first novel which has left him unable to write two years later. In desperation he goes to stay with his old teacher.
The Truth About the Harry Quebert Affair, however, is not a novel about writing. At times it pretends to be, with each chapter preceded by one of Harry’s 31 rules of writing, in which he dispenses such nuggets of wisdom as:
“The first chapter is essential. If readers don’t like it, they won’t read the rest of your book.”
Over the course of the novel, he develops a lengthy analogy with boxing that would make the Karate Kid blush while allowing Dicker to number the chapters in reverse order in a way that might fool the unwary reader into thinking that it’s meaningful. It doesn’t help that both Goldman and Quebert are presented as successful writers critically as well as commercially, a suggestion that is difficult to take seriously whenever Dicker presents ‘extracts’ from their work:
“He had to accept the truth. From now on, he would do nothing but wait for her. He would spend his whole life waiting for her. But he knew perfectly well that she would never return. He knew he would never see her again, never hear her again, never find her again.”
The Truth About the Harry Quebert Affair is a page-turner – and at 600 pages it pretty much has to be. That the pages fly by suits the animated stick figure characterisation, but as a thriller the novel works well. Early in Goldman’s visit, Harry fortuitously confesses to an affair with a fifteen year old girl, Nola, who disappeared on the very night they had planned to run away together. Cue the girl’s body being discovered years later in Harry’s yard, Harry being dragged off to jail, and Goldman determined to get to the truth and prove Harry’s innocence, while at the same time being anonymously threatened. Goldman does little more than interview people but there is an undeniable fascination in watching him apparently circle closer and closer to the truth, and Dicker constructs an intricate plot that continues to surprise until the end, with enough red herrings for Comintern’s breakfast.
What Dicker adds, in making his lead character a writer, is his narrator’s ability to keep reimagining the different scenarios – what might have happened – particularly once he starts writing a books about the affair. As has been pointed out elsewhere, this seems to be a novel designed for the e-reader with its frequent recapping and retelling of events. When new information seems to contradict what Goldman already knows he simply listens to his taped interview again, allowing the reader to reread the appropriate section without having to go to the effort of finding it.
The Truth About the Harry Quebert Affair has also been compared to The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (wishful thinking on the publishers part, perhaps). In its readability, clunky prose, and literary pretentions there are some similarities, but this is a much more light-hearted affair (some of the most enjoyable sections are where it satirises commercial publishing). The blurb suggests it is the “great American novel in all but authorship” (perhaps that means in all but the way it’s written). The most American aspect of the novel is its raw commercial design – why else, for example, would it be set in America? With summer approaching, this is a novel to save for the beach – on your Kindle, of course.
July 25, 2014 at 1:37 am |
I was so disappointed in this book I didn’t even bother to review it. By the time I finished it, I was done in so many ways. I thought the writing needlessly long, tiresome in its effort to make a (boring) point, and to top it off it didn’t resemble America to me at all. I just looked at it as a 28 year old kid’s effort, and can’t imagine how it won such accolades.
July 25, 2014 at 2:04 pm |
Yes, it is a bit of a mystery. Presumably it’s partly down to a successful publicity campaign. The biggest irony is that the book is based around the idea of two fantastic novels!
March 28, 2019 at 9:22 am |
Well I watched it would of rather read it but I’m enjoying it each to their own though but I’d recommend the book
March 28, 2019 at 9:41 pm |
I found the book quite gripping but the TV series rather slow – not sure why.