The Notebook

untitled (16)

Whatever or whoever convinced CB Editions to reprint Agota Kristof’s The Notebook earlier this year, that decision was a stroke of genius. Originally published in 1986 and quickly made available in English by Alan Sheridan, it had long fallen out of print in the UK. As Kristof was hardly prolific after this first novel, and died in 2011, it seemed likely that her work would fade from memory here, but instead it would be reasonable to claim that she is the rediscovery of 2014. This is all the more surprising when we take into account the unredeemed bleakness of the novel’s vision.

The novel is set during wartime – which war is not mentioned, it doesn’t matter to the poor and dispossessed of the novel, but Kristof’s birth in 1935 and various other clues make clear that this is the Second World War and we are in Eastern Europe (Kristof was born in Hungary). The novel is narrated in the first person plural by twin boys who are taken by their mother to stay with their grandmother in the countryside where it is safer and there is more food. The grandmother is a figure of unrelenting bitterness; her daughter has not spoken to her in years and only desperation has driven her back for her children’s sake. The grandmother asks her what she has done with the other children:

“Bitches have four or five puppies at a time. You keep one or two and drown the others.”

Despite Grandmother’s harsh treatment, the twins seem to have a built in survival instinct (one of Kristof’s aims seems to be to make us think about what it takes to survive): they sabotage the ladder to the attic so only they can get there and then make holes to spy on the rooms below; when they find a dead soldier in the woods they take his gun and cartridges and hide them. They take this one step further when they begin to train themselves to cope with all that life might throw at them:

“We decide to toughen our bodies to be able to bear pain without crying.
We start by hitting and then punching one another.”

Grotesque as this is, there is a logic to it that comments on the life they must live rather than their desire to be fit for it. Later ‘exercises’ include insulting each other, begging and fasting. They reject self-pity, telling a soldier who has deserted, “Crying is no use, you know. We never cry.”

The twins have each other, but other characters suffer a desperate loneliness that can only be temporarily assuaged through sexual contact in a world where affectation no longer exists. Kristof writes about sex and children through the twins’ objective lens, neither repulsed nor prurient. When the Priest’s housekeeper bathes them she cannot resist touching them and getting them to touch her: “Oh! How nice it is, how nice it is to play with you!” This scene seems positively homely, however, compared to the neighbour’s daughter enticing a dog to penetrate her, or the army officer who rents a room in Grandmother’s house asking the boys to urinate on his face. Shocking as these moments are, they demonstrate a world where appetite is all as the future is too uncertain to even be thought of.

Are the twins, then, amoral? In fact, they often show kindness in the novel, for example when they take food to a neighbour. When they see the housekeeper taunt a passing prisoner (part of the ‘human herd’ being transported through the village) with bread they punish her by placing one of the soldier’s cartridges in the firewood they take to the Priest. When a girl is housed with them for protection and they fear their Grandmother intends to kill her, they protest:

“We promised the old gentleman to look after pour cousin. So nothing must happen to her – either through accident or illness. Nothing.”

The twins may in some ways exist beyond good and evil, but they live by rules, and it is the unrelenting logic of those rules that makes the novel so terrifying. Usually child narrators are used for irony or sentimentality, but here they provide an unnerving clarity. I was reminded of J. G. Ballard’s reply when he was asked about his unusual childhood in a Japanese prisoner-of-war camp. It was not unusual, he said, most children in the world experienced much the same.

Advertisements

Tags: ,

8 Responses to “The Notebook”

  1. charles Says:

    The Notebook is harsh, but with a terrifying and somehow also merciful clarity. As to how CB editions came to publish it: I knew the book, long out of print; Nina Bogin translated a brief Kristof memoir, The Illiterate, offered it to the publisher of her poetry, who in turn referred it to me; yes; but little point in publishing the memoir if The Notebook was not available in the UK, so some emailing and then rights. The two short novels that follow on from The Notebook will be re-issued by CBe early next year. All of the books should be on the Penguin Modern Classics list, but sometimes they need prompting. (Another good CBe book this year has been May-Lan Tan’s Things to Make and Break; there was an afternoon when I sat in a cafe with author and agent, and agent asked me what other books I’d be publishing at around the same time, and I mentioned Kristof’s The Notebook, a superb book that no one had read, and May-Lan said that she’d once stayed up all night reading this book and we were on track, on track.)

    • 1streading Says:

      Thanks for providing this insight – and, above all, for publishing the book. You’re absolutely right, it would not be out of place in Penguin’s Modern Classics line. As you might guess, I’m looking forward to reading the other two books in the trilogy.

  2. hastanton Says:

    This sounds a very interesting book altho perhaps a little unnerving .

  3. JacquiWine Says:

    I’ve seen The Notebook in quite a few round-ups now, and it seems to have struck a chord this year. I have this book, but for me it’ll be a question of finding the right time to read it… Thanks for the review.

    • 1streading Says:

      Yes, I picked it up having read more than one positive review. It’s interesting how many of the novels that have attracted praise recently have in common a sense of merciless honesty (I’m thinking of Knausgaard and Ferrante here).

  4. Max Cairnduff Says:

    This is very much on my radar. It’s the first of a trilogy I believe, do you think you’ll read the second and third? I think CB is bringing those out too.

    The points on morality are well made, but morality is hard to maintain when you’re hungry, particularly I’d have thought for children. It sounds here as you say that they aren’t amoral, they have rules and show kindness, but their situation is such as to render much morality perhaps redundant or a non-sequitur.

    Nice review. Glad I’ve discovered your blog.

    • 1streading Says:

      You’re right – there is morality but not conventional morality. What Kristof does so well is demonstrate the cruelty of life by the twins’ adaptation to it. I’ll certainly be reading the other two books – I didn’t mention it in the review, but The Notebook actually ends in something of a cliff-hanger. Thanks for the kind words about the blog – your comments are always welcome.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: